Now, my position on desserts in general is that although I love elaborate desserts (and this one isn't even that elaborate), if you're going to spend a lot of time or energy on something, you don't spend it making the thing look the most elegant; you spend it making the dessert itself as impressive as possible. If I were going to spend all afternoon making the best cake I could, I'd probably spend my time making a terrific real buttercream frosting (so-called "buttercream frosting" made with confectioner's sugar cannot compare) and making a filling myself on top of the stove. I wouldn't waste my time carefully constructing solid chocolate sidewalls and chocolate curls and ruffles to place on top. This position as it applies to the dessert in question is that even though it would be a nice dessert, it's just too much effort to carefully dip the doughnut holes in chocolate, dip them again after they cool into melted chocolate, dip those into melted chocolate again, then dip that into carefully colored glaze. If you want chocolate on doughnut with glaze on top, just dip them once in chocolate, and just drizzle the glaze on top! This dessert would taste good, but it would be lots and lots of effort to make, and most of that effort would have nothing to do with the flavor.
So I beg you, Flist, resolve the question:
Poll #555594 Giant M&Ms: yay or nay?
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 15
Would you be for the kind of pastry my sister and her POSSLQ were advocating?
View Answers
| Yay! |
| Nay! |
| Only if someone else makes them. |
| POSSLQ! *snicker* |
August 20 2005, 07:57:00 UTC 6 years ago
On the other hand, having just made lemon meringue layer cake -- I do feel like presentation, especially for a party, is important. You want something to look glorious as well as taste glorious.
Chocolate decoration is not my thing, but toffee shards are: and I love meringue for the burgeoning, bulging, golden buff bronze celebratory feel it brings.
I had always rather decorate with fresh fruit than with artifice, though.
August 20 2005, 13:24:52 UTC 6 years ago
Maybe if you made it with a small enough donut bit that it would be bite-size, but that seems like it would be less desserty and more sugary-snacky.
August 20 2005, 18:15:05 UTC 6 years ago
what the hell does POSSLQ stand for? i know who, but what does it stand for?
August 20 2005, 18:41:08 UTC 6 years ago